Home Site Map
About AE Services Clients News Contact
Reports
Presentations
Press
Economic Development Links

Survey Results: Economic Development Marketing Innovation and Best Practices Survey

May 2006

By: AngelouEconomics

In today's competitive landscape, economic development organizations are faced with the increasing challenge of marketing their community to a select group for a finite number of projects. Economic development can be described as having two functions: product improvement and product promotion. Product or community improvement initiatives are most effective when the community works together to strengthen its assets. It is the role of the economic development organizations to communicate these assets to the outside world and improve the perception (or in some cases change a misperception) of the community.

What are the most effective activities that can help a community to accomplish this? AngelouEconomics created a national survey to send to economic development organizations across the country - from small, rural communities to major metropolitan areas - to find out best marketing practices. We received over 200 responses from economic development organizations representing population sizes of less than 100,000 to over 1 million.

 

About the Respondents

The majority of our respondents were non-profit ED organizations (48%). Others were government ED departments (25%) and 17% were chamber organizations.

As far as service areas, the respondents were split almost evenly between city service (29%), county (27%) and a multi-city or county region (29%). The majority of respondents serviced a population of less than 100,000 (40%). 27% represented an area of over 1 million.

 

Marketing Practices

The vast majority of respondents utilize a strategic economic development plan in their efforts (97%) which most have developed internally (74%). In addition, 90% of respondents have a marketing plan in place with 94% of them managing their marketing activities internally. Some of the marketing activities, which are most often outsourced, include:

Activity
Percent Outsourced
Public Relations and Media Buying
85%
Website Improvement/Electronic Marketing
81%
Branding and Awareness
69%

 

Other activities that were listed as requiring outsourced assistance included tourism development, international strategies, and development of marketing materials and design.

Regarding the effectiveness of marketing tools, respondents had a broad range of opinions.  The most effective marketing tools were:

Most Effective Marketing Tools
Percent
Website
62%
Co-Op Marketing (marketing cooperatively with a regional/state organization)
30%
Familiarization Tour
24%
Public Relations
19%

 

The tools that respondents listed as the least effective were:

Least Effective Marketing Tools
Percent
Telephone Cold Calls
20%
CD-ROMS
10%

 

Those found to be moderately effective included:

Moderately Effective Marketing Tools
Percent
Tradeshows (12% rated this least effective)
40%
Special Events
37%
E-Newsletter (16% rated this as most effective)
34%
Advertising
31%

 

On a side-note, a high percentage of some marketing activities received a "Not Applicable" ranking, perhaps because these tools are not used by a large number or respondents. These included Media Familiarization Tours (33%), Interactive Media Advertising (33%), and CD-Roms (34%).

Targeting appears to be an important strategy for most respondents. Many have already established industry targets as part of their overall strategy. The majority use internal research departments to establish their target lists (78%). 70% use referrals and 65% use word of mouth. Only 31% subscribe to a database service and 23% purchase customized lists.

These industry targets run from the very broad (high-tech) to very specific (ship manufacturing, pottery). As in all marketing endeavors, it is important to develop targets that fit a community’s assets. The top 10 target industries respondents listed include:

Top 10 Industry Targets
1.  High-tech
(including IT and semiconductors)

2.  Biotech/Life sciences

3.  Logistics/Distribution
4.  Light Manufacturing
5.  Aerospace/Aviation
6.  Automotive
7.  Professional Services
8. (tie)  Plastics
            Food Processing
9.  Tourism/Hospitality
10.  Retail

 

Others included medical device manufacturing, agriculture, wood products, clean energy, and defense.

One of the methods used to communicate with target industries is through industry trade shows. Below are the top trade shows that respondents listed as attending. The majority participate in tradeshows as attendees only (71%) while 65% attend as exhibitors, 61% participate through coop participation with a state or regional entity, and 35% host events as part of their trade show attendance. The top eight trade shows are:

Top Trade Shows

CoreNet Global

Industrial Asset Management Council
National Association of Manufacturers

 

46% of respondents run print ads in industry trade publications (among those that advertise at all). The others use economic development trade publications such as Site Selection, Area Development, Business Facilities, Expansion Management and Southern Business & Development for their print ads. A small percentage (17%) place print ads in general business or news magazines. However, a significant number (36%) run ads regionally in regional news outlets.

 

Strengths and Weaknesses

Most of the marketing strengths listed by respondents not surprisingly were based on their existing assets including quality of life, location, workforce, low costs, etc. This response shows that most communities are utilizing the same assets as differentiators. In order to truly stand apart from the competition, communities will have to focus efforts on finding other qualities that make them unique. Several respondents also listed as a strength their existing positive image and name recognition.

An interesting trend included listing organizational structure as strengths. This included effective website and collateral materials, proactive and well-funded strategies, local government support, experienced staff and a great track record. Also given significant focus were existing relationships. Not only relationships with site selectors and within targeted industries, but also relationships with allies such as regional partners, utilities, and state organizations.

As far as their challenges, most respondents seem to face similar hurdles.

By far the largest challenge mentioned by respondents were resources, both in terms of funding and staff/time. Challenges are also organizational in nature including lack of a focus, lack of a plan, no targeted marketing and no follow up. Lack of awareness, branding or a misperception of the community was also a major challenge for some respondents.

Other challenges are focused around the community's assets. These challenges include high costs for housing and land, high taxes, lack of a skilled and educated workforce, lack of incentives, and lack of transportation infrastructure. While many respondents listed location as a strength, it is also a challenge for others. Overcoming these challenges through community improvements and focusing on existing attributes should be a key component of their strategy.

An additional challenge discussed concerns a lack of support from the state level or poor attitudes at the local level. This includes difficulty in getting state support in terms of incentives, a negative attitude from local elected officials and the lack of an entrepreneurial environment. Marketing to the outside cannot be successful without internal support, so changing attitudes at home is of tremendous significance.

With regards to funding of marketing, most of the survey respondents that chose to provide funding and resource information had an overall budget of $100,000 - $500,000, ranging from a low of $80,000 to a high of $50 million. In terms of marketing budget, the responses ranged from $0 to a high of $6 million with a majority listing their marketing budget as below $100,000. Only five respondents had a marketing budget over $1 million.

In order to be successful, sufficient resources need to be allocated to marketing efforts. Generally speaking, below are typical marketing budgets for respondents that serve a population of 500,000 or less:

Community Population
Marketing Budget
< 100,000
$70,000
100-250,000
$120,000
250-500,000 $250,000

 

This correlates to less than a dollar per person. In order to maximize return on investment, marketing dollars should be spent wisely on those activities that are the most effective.

 

Best Practices

Over 113 communities and organizations from across the country were nominated by their peers as an example of economic development marketing best practices. Several organizations were nominated in more than one of the categories.

Named in more than four categories:

  • Greater Phoenix Economic Council
  • Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce
  • Bastrop Economic Development Corporation

Named in more than three categories:

  • San Antonio Economic Development Foundation
  • Longview Economic Development Corporation
  • Economic Development Partnership of Alabama

 

Best Economic Development Marketing Strategy
The organization receiving the most nominations for this category was the Greater Phoenix Economic Council. Other entities receiving more than one nomination included the Charlotte Regional Partnership, the Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce and Alabama Power.

Best Economic Development Website
Many respondents nominated their favorites for this category which received the largest number of nominations. There were so many nominations that most entities were nominated only once. Those that received more than one nomination (nominating themselves did not count) were:

  • Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation
  • Economic Development Partnership of Alabama
  • Greater Phoenix Economic Council
  • Longview Economic Development
 

Other website favorites included the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Oklahoma. Communities ranged from the large metros of the Greater Houston Partnership and Metro Orlando to Midland, Texas, and Spokane, Washington.

Best Industry Campaign
There were no clear winners in this category. Favorites included the Greater Austin Chamber, San Antonio Economic Development Foundation, the Omaha space program, the Richmond Partnership, and Ontario Canada.

Best Collateral
There were no clear favorites for this category either. Favorites ranged from states such as the State of Texas Economic Development Office and Arizona Tourism Office to the Mid-Florida Economic Development Corporation and the Mobile Area Chamber of Commerce.

Best Print Ads
The print ads from the San Antonio Economic Development Foundation were the favorite of respondents. Other nominated campaigns include the Greater Austin Chamber, Greenwood Mississippi, Scottsdale, Arizona, and the Tennessee ECD.

Best Electronic Campaign
Longview Economic Development Council's campaign appeared to be the favorite of respondents. Others include the San Antonio Economic Development Foundation, the City of Atlanta, and the Springfield Chamber of Commerce.

 

Innovative Practices
Some of the trends highlighted by our respondents regarding innovative practices involve developing alliances, targeting, funding, downtown development, and international marketing. To summarize some of these innovative practices:

  • Organizations are forming alliances regionally, creating collaborative efforts with universities, and forming marketing coalitions to reduce costs for advertising and tradeshow participation.
  • Organizations are developing unique programs for fundraising in order to effectively market, creating local alliances to fund needed services, finding funding mechanisms and grants for downtown revitalization for small communities.
  • Organizations are taking target marketing a step further through niche marketing, revising materials to focus more closely on customer needs, implementing programs to focus on international markets, utilizing public relations to promote successes within and without the community.

Specific programs will be highlighted in future newsletters.

Marketing and communication play a significant role in economic development. However, it is important to not rely solely on external corporate recruitment as the primary marketing activity. Stakeholder support and communication is equally as important as a successful program needs to start from within the community.

Economic vitality also comes from the growth of local companies, small business start-ups, entrepreneurial activity and tourism. These components should also be included as part of your communications strategy. Remember, marketing begins at home in the community. The best marketing campaign in the world will fail without community support and a good community product with assets and infrastructure in place.

 

 

 

  ABOUT AE | SERVICES | CLIENTS | NEWS | CONTACT | SITE MAP

©2008 AngelouEconomics Inc. Global Economic Development, Site Selection and Economic Analysis.